software package systat sigmaplot 9.0 Search Results


component exponential function  (SYSTAT)
99
SYSTAT component exponential function
Temporal features of high light-evoked PLRs were equivalent between WT and MNU eyes: A) The initial phase of high light-evoked PLRs is displayed in a short time scale. The latency from the light stimulus onset (black dotted line) to the start of the PLR in WT eyes (blue dotted line) and MNU eyes (red dotted line) are shown. B) A summary graph shows the latency in WT and MNU eyes, which showed a significant delay (p<0.05, Student’s unpaired t-test ). The means for WT and MNU are presented in blue and red. C) The onsets of high light-evoked PLRs were fit by single component <t>exponential</t> decay curves for WT eyes (blue) and MNU (red) injected mice (R2>0.90). D) A scatter plot showing each curve fit’s time constant (tau). MNU exhibited low tau, indicating a faster PLR constriction phase than WT PLR (p<0.05, n=12 mice). E) A scatter plot showing peak constriction showed no differences between WT and MNU mice (p= 0.07, n=12 mice).
Component Exponential Function, supplied by SYSTAT, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/component exponential function/product/SYSTAT
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
component exponential function - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
sigmaplot 9.0  (SYSTAT)
90
SYSTAT sigmaplot 9.0
Temporal features of high light-evoked PLRs were equivalent between WT and MNU eyes: A) The initial phase of high light-evoked PLRs is displayed in a short time scale. The latency from the light stimulus onset (black dotted line) to the start of the PLR in WT eyes (blue dotted line) and MNU eyes (red dotted line) are shown. B) A summary graph shows the latency in WT and MNU eyes, which showed a significant delay (p<0.05, Student’s unpaired t-test ). The means for WT and MNU are presented in blue and red. C) The onsets of high light-evoked PLRs were fit by single component <t>exponential</t> decay curves for WT eyes (blue) and MNU (red) injected mice (R2>0.90). D) A scatter plot showing each curve fit’s time constant (tau). MNU exhibited low tau, indicating a faster PLR constriction phase than WT PLR (p<0.05, n=12 mice). E) A scatter plot showing peak constriction showed no differences between WT and MNU mice (p= 0.07, n=12 mice).
Sigmaplot 9.0, supplied by SYSTAT, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/sigmaplot 9.0/product/SYSTAT
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sigmaplot 9.0 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
tablecurve 2d 5.01  (SYSTAT)
90
SYSTAT tablecurve 2d 5.01
Temporal features of high light-evoked PLRs were equivalent between WT and MNU eyes: A) The initial phase of high light-evoked PLRs is displayed in a short time scale. The latency from the light stimulus onset (black dotted line) to the start of the PLR in WT eyes (blue dotted line) and MNU eyes (red dotted line) are shown. B) A summary graph shows the latency in WT and MNU eyes, which showed a significant delay (p<0.05, Student’s unpaired t-test ). The means for WT and MNU are presented in blue and red. C) The onsets of high light-evoked PLRs were fit by single component <t>exponential</t> decay curves for WT eyes (blue) and MNU (red) injected mice (R2>0.90). D) A scatter plot showing each curve fit’s time constant (tau). MNU exhibited low tau, indicating a faster PLR constriction phase than WT PLR (p<0.05, n=12 mice). E) A scatter plot showing peak constriction showed no differences between WT and MNU mice (p= 0.07, n=12 mice).
Tablecurve 2d 5.01, supplied by SYSTAT, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/tablecurve 2d 5.01/product/SYSTAT
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tablecurve 2d 5.01 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
curve fitting software sigmaplot version 9.0  (SYSTAT)
90
SYSTAT curve fitting software sigmaplot version 9.0
Temporal features of high light-evoked PLRs were equivalent between WT and MNU eyes: A) The initial phase of high light-evoked PLRs is displayed in a short time scale. The latency from the light stimulus onset (black dotted line) to the start of the PLR in WT eyes (blue dotted line) and MNU eyes (red dotted line) are shown. B) A summary graph shows the latency in WT and MNU eyes, which showed a significant delay (p<0.05, Student’s unpaired t-test ). The means for WT and MNU are presented in blue and red. C) The onsets of high light-evoked PLRs were fit by single component <t>exponential</t> decay curves for WT eyes (blue) and MNU (red) injected mice (R2>0.90). D) A scatter plot showing each curve fit’s time constant (tau). MNU exhibited low tau, indicating a faster PLR constriction phase than WT PLR (p<0.05, n=12 mice). E) A scatter plot showing peak constriction showed no differences between WT and MNU mice (p= 0.07, n=12 mice).
Curve Fitting Software Sigmaplot Version 9.0, supplied by SYSTAT, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/curve fitting software sigmaplot version 9.0/product/SYSTAT
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
curve fitting software sigmaplot version 9.0 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
curve fitting  (SYSTAT)
90
SYSTAT curve fitting
Temporal features of high light-evoked PLRs were equivalent between WT and MNU eyes: A) The initial phase of high light-evoked PLRs is displayed in a short time scale. The latency from the light stimulus onset (black dotted line) to the start of the PLR in WT eyes (blue dotted line) and MNU eyes (red dotted line) are shown. B) A summary graph shows the latency in WT and MNU eyes, which showed a significant delay (p<0.05, Student’s unpaired t-test ). The means for WT and MNU are presented in blue and red. C) The onsets of high light-evoked PLRs were fit by single component <t>exponential</t> decay curves for WT eyes (blue) and MNU (red) injected mice (R2>0.90). D) A scatter plot showing each curve fit’s time constant (tau). MNU exhibited low tau, indicating a faster PLR constriction phase than WT PLR (p<0.05, n=12 mice). E) A scatter plot showing peak constriction showed no differences between WT and MNU mice (p= 0.07, n=12 mice).
Curve Fitting, supplied by SYSTAT, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/curve fitting/product/SYSTAT
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
curve fitting - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
sigmaplot  (SYSTAT)
90
SYSTAT sigmaplot
Temporal features of high light-evoked PLRs were equivalent between WT and MNU eyes: A) The initial phase of high light-evoked PLRs is displayed in a short time scale. The latency from the light stimulus onset (black dotted line) to the start of the PLR in WT eyes (blue dotted line) and MNU eyes (red dotted line) are shown. B) A summary graph shows the latency in WT and MNU eyes, which showed a significant delay (p<0.05, Student’s unpaired t-test ). The means for WT and MNU are presented in blue and red. C) The onsets of high light-evoked PLRs were fit by single component <t>exponential</t> decay curves for WT eyes (blue) and MNU (red) injected mice (R2>0.90). D) A scatter plot showing each curve fit’s time constant (tau). MNU exhibited low tau, indicating a faster PLR constriction phase than WT PLR (p<0.05, n=12 mice). E) A scatter plot showing peak constriction showed no differences between WT and MNU mice (p= 0.07, n=12 mice).
Sigmaplot, supplied by SYSTAT, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/sigmaplot/product/SYSTAT
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sigmaplot - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
sigmaplot 8.0  (SYSTAT)
90
SYSTAT sigmaplot 8.0
Temporal features of high light-evoked PLRs were equivalent between WT and MNU eyes: A) The initial phase of high light-evoked PLRs is displayed in a short time scale. The latency from the light stimulus onset (black dotted line) to the start of the PLR in WT eyes (blue dotted line) and MNU eyes (red dotted line) are shown. B) A summary graph shows the latency in WT and MNU eyes, which showed a significant delay (p<0.05, Student’s unpaired t-test ). The means for WT and MNU are presented in blue and red. C) The onsets of high light-evoked PLRs were fit by single component <t>exponential</t> decay curves for WT eyes (blue) and MNU (red) injected mice (R2>0.90). D) A scatter plot showing each curve fit’s time constant (tau). MNU exhibited low tau, indicating a faster PLR constriction phase than WT PLR (p<0.05, n=12 mice). E) A scatter plot showing peak constriction showed no differences between WT and MNU mice (p= 0.07, n=12 mice).
Sigmaplot 8.0, supplied by SYSTAT, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/sigmaplot 8.0/product/SYSTAT
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sigmaplot 8.0 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
sigmaplot 5.01 9.0  (SYSTAT)
90
SYSTAT sigmaplot 5.01 9.0
Temporal features of high light-evoked PLRs were equivalent between WT and MNU eyes: A) The initial phase of high light-evoked PLRs is displayed in a short time scale. The latency from the light stimulus onset (black dotted line) to the start of the PLR in WT eyes (blue dotted line) and MNU eyes (red dotted line) are shown. B) A summary graph shows the latency in WT and MNU eyes, which showed a significant delay (p<0.05, Student’s unpaired t-test ). The means for WT and MNU are presented in blue and red. C) The onsets of high light-evoked PLRs were fit by single component <t>exponential</t> decay curves for WT eyes (blue) and MNU (red) injected mice (R2>0.90). D) A scatter plot showing each curve fit’s time constant (tau). MNU exhibited low tau, indicating a faster PLR constriction phase than WT PLR (p<0.05, n=12 mice). E) A scatter plot showing peak constriction showed no differences between WT and MNU mice (p= 0.07, n=12 mice).
Sigmaplot 5.01 9.0, supplied by SYSTAT, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/sigmaplot 5.01 9.0/product/SYSTAT
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sigmaplot 5.01 9.0 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
neuroexplorer  (SYSTAT)
90
SYSTAT neuroexplorer
Temporal features of high light-evoked PLRs were equivalent between WT and MNU eyes: A) The initial phase of high light-evoked PLRs is displayed in a short time scale. The latency from the light stimulus onset (black dotted line) to the start of the PLR in WT eyes (blue dotted line) and MNU eyes (red dotted line) are shown. B) A summary graph shows the latency in WT and MNU eyes, which showed a significant delay (p<0.05, Student’s unpaired t-test ). The means for WT and MNU are presented in blue and red. C) The onsets of high light-evoked PLRs were fit by single component <t>exponential</t> decay curves for WT eyes (blue) and MNU (red) injected mice (R2>0.90). D) A scatter plot showing each curve fit’s time constant (tau). MNU exhibited low tau, indicating a faster PLR constriction phase than WT PLR (p<0.05, n=12 mice). E) A scatter plot showing peak constriction showed no differences between WT and MNU mice (p= 0.07, n=12 mice).
Neuroexplorer, supplied by SYSTAT, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/neuroexplorer/product/SYSTAT
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
neuroexplorer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
enzyme kinetics module of sigmaplot 9.0  (SYSTAT)
90
SYSTAT enzyme kinetics module of sigmaplot 9.0
Temporal features of high light-evoked PLRs were equivalent between WT and MNU eyes: A) The initial phase of high light-evoked PLRs is displayed in a short time scale. The latency from the light stimulus onset (black dotted line) to the start of the PLR in WT eyes (blue dotted line) and MNU eyes (red dotted line) are shown. B) A summary graph shows the latency in WT and MNU eyes, which showed a significant delay (p<0.05, Student’s unpaired t-test ). The means for WT and MNU are presented in blue and red. C) The onsets of high light-evoked PLRs were fit by single component <t>exponential</t> decay curves for WT eyes (blue) and MNU (red) injected mice (R2>0.90). D) A scatter plot showing each curve fit’s time constant (tau). MNU exhibited low tau, indicating a faster PLR constriction phase than WT PLR (p<0.05, n=12 mice). E) A scatter plot showing peak constriction showed no differences between WT and MNU mice (p= 0.07, n=12 mice).
Enzyme Kinetics Module Of Sigmaplot 9.0, supplied by SYSTAT, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/enzyme kinetics module of sigmaplot 9.0/product/SYSTAT
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
enzyme kinetics module of sigmaplot 9.0 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
sigmastat 3.1  (SYSTAT)
90
SYSTAT sigmastat 3.1
Temporal features of high light-evoked PLRs were equivalent between WT and MNU eyes: A) The initial phase of high light-evoked PLRs is displayed in a short time scale. The latency from the light stimulus onset (black dotted line) to the start of the PLR in WT eyes (blue dotted line) and MNU eyes (red dotted line) are shown. B) A summary graph shows the latency in WT and MNU eyes, which showed a significant delay (p<0.05, Student’s unpaired t-test ). The means for WT and MNU are presented in blue and red. C) The onsets of high light-evoked PLRs were fit by single component <t>exponential</t> decay curves for WT eyes (blue) and MNU (red) injected mice (R2>0.90). D) A scatter plot showing each curve fit’s time constant (tau). MNU exhibited low tau, indicating a faster PLR constriction phase than WT PLR (p<0.05, n=12 mice). E) A scatter plot showing peak constriction showed no differences between WT and MNU mice (p= 0.07, n=12 mice).
Sigmastat 3.1, supplied by SYSTAT, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/sigmastat 3.1/product/SYSTAT
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sigmastat 3.1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
curve fitting analyses  (SYSTAT)
90
SYSTAT curve fitting analyses
Temporal features of high light-evoked PLRs were equivalent between WT and MNU eyes: A) The initial phase of high light-evoked PLRs is displayed in a short time scale. The latency from the light stimulus onset (black dotted line) to the start of the PLR in WT eyes (blue dotted line) and MNU eyes (red dotted line) are shown. B) A summary graph shows the latency in WT and MNU eyes, which showed a significant delay (p<0.05, Student’s unpaired t-test ). The means for WT and MNU are presented in blue and red. C) The onsets of high light-evoked PLRs were fit by single component <t>exponential</t> decay curves for WT eyes (blue) and MNU (red) injected mice (R2>0.90). D) A scatter plot showing each curve fit’s time constant (tau). MNU exhibited low tau, indicating a faster PLR constriction phase than WT PLR (p<0.05, n=12 mice). E) A scatter plot showing peak constriction showed no differences between WT and MNU mice (p= 0.07, n=12 mice).
Curve Fitting Analyses, supplied by SYSTAT, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/curve fitting analyses/product/SYSTAT
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
curve fitting analyses - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Temporal features of high light-evoked PLRs were equivalent between WT and MNU eyes: A) The initial phase of high light-evoked PLRs is displayed in a short time scale. The latency from the light stimulus onset (black dotted line) to the start of the PLR in WT eyes (blue dotted line) and MNU eyes (red dotted line) are shown. B) A summary graph shows the latency in WT and MNU eyes, which showed a significant delay (p<0.05, Student’s unpaired t-test ). The means for WT and MNU are presented in blue and red. C) The onsets of high light-evoked PLRs were fit by single component exponential decay curves for WT eyes (blue) and MNU (red) injected mice (R2>0.90). D) A scatter plot showing each curve fit’s time constant (tau). MNU exhibited low tau, indicating a faster PLR constriction phase than WT PLR (p<0.05, n=12 mice). E) A scatter plot showing peak constriction showed no differences between WT and MNU mice (p= 0.07, n=12 mice).

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Melanopsin ganglion cells in the mouse retina independently evoke pupillary light reflex

doi: 10.1101/2024.05.14.594181

Figure Lengend Snippet: Temporal features of high light-evoked PLRs were equivalent between WT and MNU eyes: A) The initial phase of high light-evoked PLRs is displayed in a short time scale. The latency from the light stimulus onset (black dotted line) to the start of the PLR in WT eyes (blue dotted line) and MNU eyes (red dotted line) are shown. B) A summary graph shows the latency in WT and MNU eyes, which showed a significant delay (p<0.05, Student’s unpaired t-test ). The means for WT and MNU are presented in blue and red. C) The onsets of high light-evoked PLRs were fit by single component exponential decay curves for WT eyes (blue) and MNU (red) injected mice (R2>0.90). D) A scatter plot showing each curve fit’s time constant (tau). MNU exhibited low tau, indicating a faster PLR constriction phase than WT PLR (p<0.05, n=12 mice). E) A scatter plot showing peak constriction showed no differences between WT and MNU mice (p= 0.07, n=12 mice).

Article Snippet: For the analysis of the transient constriction during high light conditions, raw traces were fitted with a single component exponential function (R 2 > .90, SigmaPlot14.5, Systat).

Techniques: Injection